Desertbreh wrote: ↑Mon Sep 11, 2023 1:14 pm
SAWCE wrote: ↑Mon Sep 11, 2023 12:46 pm
So last Wednesday Michelle had he HSG test to figure out some of this fertility stuff. We need to go back for different kinds of scans (MRI and something else) to verify, but it appears from that X-ray that she only has one fallopian tube and that he uterus is not the normal shape.
Based on this our chance of conceiving and her carrying a baby to term is something like 0.4%.
So that’s shitty.
Our options now are basically reduced to adoption or surrogacy, which is $$$. My older sister offered to be a surrogate for us, but at 37 she’d be considered a geriatric pregnancy and would be at a higher risk if complications.. I don’t know that Michelle or I are comfortable asking her to put herself at risk for us to do something as selfish as have a bio-child. How do we live with ourselves if something physical or mental like postpartum depression goes wrong?
Adoption is $$ too, but not nearly to the same tune as surrogacy, and comes without all of the environmental impacts of adding another human to the world, since they were already or going to already be here.
Last response was a little wooden. Sorry guys! It would make more sense to me on this baby stuff to X-ray at the beginning of the process instead of adding insult to frustration. Buuuut......that's not how our health care system works.
It’s such a pain in the ass system. They want to ensure you’ve been trying for a full year before they’ll see the woman for just about anything? Seems completely backwards.. why can’t a couple, or woman, show up and say “I want to start my family planning” and just get the full array of testing done up front to see if she’s even physically able to conceive and carry a child? Why make people go through the heartache of trying for a year, possibly going through miscarriages, and then try to push these appointments out like they did to us because “we’ll you got pregnant once, surely it’ll happen again!”.. we had to fight to keep this appointment scheduled which is unreal.
But yeah, to answer other questions, DINK lyfe would absolutely work for me, but Michelle isn’t interested. That’s fine, I knew that going into the relationship/marriage.
Adoption definitely looks different today than it used to. Most agencies promote open adoptions, so you have ti navigate how having your child’s biological parent involved in their life to some extent looks and works for your family. I see the benefit in that for the child’s mental well-being, but definitely adds a layer of complication.
I’d love to go the surrogate route, especially if one of my sisters was willing to do it for us since that would cut down on the cost significantly, but I think adoption is where we are going to end up. We talked about fostering, but she thinks it’d be too heartbreaking to foster kids and develop those relationships and then see them go back to their families where they might just end up back in the shitty situation that got them into the foster system to begin with. Foster to adoption is possible, but they make it clear on the foster information that the intent is always to reunite families.