OT XXX: COVID Off Topic
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:40 pm
Yep. Didn't he also do the Beverley Hillbillies truck, the original Batmobile and the Green Hornet car, or whatever it was called?
Yep. Didn't he also do the Beverley Hillbillies truck, the original Batmobile and the Green Hornet car, or whatever it was called?
I thought so, but I fact checked myself and he actually didn't!
I had no idea.Detroit wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:42 pmI thought so, but I fact checked myself and he actually didn't!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkeemobile
That retard, just like the rest of the anti-maskers, can't grasp the notion that the mask is more to protect others from getting slobbered on. Yes, it diminishes the infection risk of the person wearing it, but not as much as if everyone in the room is wearing one. So, the argument of "People should have the choice to wear masks" isn't valid because a person choosing to not wear a mask raises the risk of infection for others in the room.wap wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:32 pm FYI, there's a raging "debate" on the Dead Zone about Covfefe-19, with some -loving retard named zrickety arguing that it's all and an ex military dr. or medic shooting down each comment with . It's weirdly entertaining. At one point it devolved to them calling each other potato.
https://www.golfmk7.com/forums/index.ph ... -2.376489/
120 pages of since July.
It's really simple for a non-Huckleberry wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 3:24 pmThat retard, just like the rest of the anti-maskers, can't grasp the notion that the mask is more to protect others from getting slobbered on. Yes, it diminishes the infection risk of the person wearing it, but not as much as if everyone in the room is wearing one. So, the argument of "People should have the choice to wear masks" isn't valid because a person choosing to not wear a mask raises the risk of infection for others in the room.wap wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:32 pm FYI, there's a raging "debate" on the Dead Zone about Covfefe-19, with some -loving retard named zrickety arguing that it's all and an ex military dr. or medic shooting down each comment with . It's weirdly entertaining. At one point it devolved to them calling each other potato.
https://www.golfmk7.com/forums/index.ph ... -2.376489/
120 pages of since July.
Also, studies have shown neck gaiters and bandanas to be ineffective facial coverings and are beginning to get banned in medical facilities. I'm sure other commercial properties will begin to follow suit. I'm pushing for it at my buildings.
Yeah I think I know what you mean, I'm not really that into arguing about what I think is right and wrong personally though. My stance on the subject is that it is better to err on the side of safety and try to keep some space between me and the next person. We all need to wear masks when indoors, so that should help a lot, even with the common cold and flu when the season hits. I actually kind of dig it LOL
I don't mind the masks. I highly mind the disinformation and censorship/rage etc when it comes to questioning the imperfect and clearly flawed data that changes weekly.Tarspin wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 7:35 pmYeah I think I know what you mean, I'm not really that into arguing about what I think is right and wrong personally though. My stance on the subject is that it is better to err on the side of safety and try to keep some space between me and the next person. We all need to wear masks when indoors, so that should help a lot, even with the common cold and flu when the season hits. I actually kind of dig it LOL
I can see why you would question the stats, and I have been paying attention to your judgment of the medical stat and how they are taken. I don't think you're off base for challenging them, maybe someday they'll come up with a better system for keeping track of this stuff. But for now it's all they know, and are probably limited by who knows how many factors on a government level. The system will never get better people don't ask questions, basically how all things improve over time. I would love for there to be a test that is 99.9% accurate and be as commonly distributed as a pack of gum.max225 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 7:41 pmI don't mind the masks. I highly mind the disinformation and censorship/rage etc when it comes to questioning the imperfect and clearly flawed data that changes weekly.Tarspin wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 7:35 pm
Yeah I think I know what you mean, I'm not really that into arguing about what I think is right and wrong personally though. My stance on the subject is that it is better to err on the side of safety and try to keep some space between me and the next person. We all need to wear masks when indoors, so that should help a lot, even with the common cold and flu when the season hits. I actually kind of dig it LOL
Yep, very reasonable response TY.Tarspin wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 7:48 pmI can see why you would question the stats, and I have been paying attention to your judgment of the medical stat and how they are taken. I don't think you're off base for challenging them, maybe someday they'll come up with a better system for keeping track of this stuff. But for now it's all they know, and are probably limited by who knows how many factors on a government level. The system will never get better people don't ask questions, basically how all things improve over time. I would love for there to be a test that is 99.9% accurate and be as commonly distributed as a pack of gum.
So get this okay, I was entrusted to be on the board of directors for my condo rental property even though it's a detached house, which is bulshit because the only thing that's common is the roadway and curbs but whatever. The first time home owners started to rent older people on the street went ape shitt because new people were in the neighbourhood. I got complaints, pictures were taken, yelling in sood and all because someone was scared of the virus from the big city. This is not going to be something that everyone is comfortable with and emotions will stay heightened for a while. I'm good with just fearing clear of people who have strong opinions about the subject.max225 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 7:55 pmYep, very reasonable response TY.Tarspin wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 7:48 pm
I can see why you would question the stats, and I have been paying attention to your judgment of the medical stat and how they are taken. I don't think you're off base for challenging them, maybe someday they'll come up with a better system for keeping track of this stuff. But for now it's all they know, and are probably limited by who knows how many factors on a government level. The system will never get better people don't ask questions, basically how all things improve over time. I would love for there to be a test that is 99.9% accurate and be as commonly distributed as a pack of gum.
To be clear I am not anti mask, and I don't think that this isn't a "real" disease.
I am however exteremly curious about the actual stats that follow the disease itself, which apparently is a taboo subject that equates you to someone who decides to wear a MAGA hat and lick toilet seats on Medical evac flights from covid zones.
So far all I can say is, the data integrity and quality that I have dug through, that was published by official sources is extremely poor. And on top of that BAD DATA gets cherry picked by plenty of "online experts" with "everything to lose" who just yell and scream and try and shut you down when one tries to point out obvious shortcomings.
NY/NJ shoved Covid patients into senior nursing homes, easily killing thousands.
can’t disagree with anything here. I wish covid lock ups didn’t have the nasty side effect of enraging peopleMelon wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 9:27 pm I tend to shy away from all discussions. It's just too incendiary.
I read the news, I come to my own conclusions, I live my life accordingly.
Keep in mind, I visited Travis, flew to Griff to pick up the blue BMW, and went on a vacation with 12 other people, and argued with others about the severity of the situation.
The hostility has taken it's toll on me tho, and I refuse to let myself sink down into hopelessness. Thus I just let the issue be.
I get tired of people who talk about it incessantly.
I get tired of people who say that "they know, because X publication" any certainty should be taken with a critical ear.
I get tired of people arguing about masks.
I get tired of people blaming political parties.
I'm just tired of people being shitty to each other. Something that should have united us against a common "enemy" has just made existing divisions worse it seems.
[user not found] wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 9:55 pmThe damn shame about it is we had one chance to get those lockdowns right with the lowest amount of economic damage and the best health outcomes and really only you guys out in Cali and New York got it right. If we (as a nation) would have all done the same thing at the same time, we probably would be in a different place now.
I can’t say that california got it right though ... matter of fact I think the only two countries that did are South Korea and Japan*.[user not found] wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 10:01 pm Psychologically you only get one shot at a lockdown and it's extremely time limited and the psychological impact is the same with a partial lockdown or a full.