Finished a bottle of Old Forester.[user not found] wrote:What ya drinking?Calvinball wrote: Sipping on some bourbon.
Sent from the Beer Depository
Sent from the Beer Depository
Finished a bottle of Old Forester.[user not found] wrote:What ya drinking?Calvinball wrote: Sipping on some bourbon.
Sent from the Beer Depository
[user not found] wrote: ↑Sat Dec 16, 2017 5:45 pm This wine is really good.
I'm glad I'm a whiskey guy though. $40 bottle of wine, one night. $40 bottle of whiskey, a month if you drink nothing else, a year if you do what I do.
You measure it out? I just eyeball it based on desired level of[user not found] wrote: ↑Sat Dec 16, 2017 5:54 pmThere are 12 pours in a bottle of whiskey and 4 in a bottle of wine.troyguitar wrote:
You apparently drink a lot more wine at a time? I get 3-4 glasses from a bottle of wine and maybe 8-10 from the same size bottle of liquor.
$40 is way out of my league for either one - more like a $5 and $25. I can't even imagine buying wine that expensive.
The "average" price for a red that is "fair/okay" is $14 retail if you believe Mr. Wonderful on Shark Tank.[user not found] wrote: ↑Sat Dec 16, 2017 6:12 pmWhoa helllll no. $10 is still a cheap bottle of wine in the wine market, not the Troy Defined Wine Market.troyguitar wrote:$10 is upper half for wine, bottom shelf starts at $2.xx a bottle and you can buy halfway decent stuff for $5-10 if you're not a corksniffer. Bottom shelf whiskey is $15 and half decent stuff is $25+
'good' wine easily gets into the $60s before you get into level stuff.
Bottom shelf whiskey starts sub $10. Usually around $8. stuff starts at $90+
I've actually had this one and I like it.[user not found] wrote: ↑Sat Dec 16, 2017 6:18 pmCorvetteWaxer wrote:
The "average" price for a red that is "fair/okay" is $14 retail if you believe Mr. Wonderful on Shark Tank.
$30-40 Cab to me is okay, but not good. I'm too used to drinking the stuff in the $150-250 per bottle range.
Sometimes I wish I never moved on from drinking Lucky Lager, Mickey's or even Budweiser. That old saying really does ring true... Ignorance is bliss.
My bottle for tonight is attached, I am guessing you say it's 'fine.'
Why not.... ?troyguitar wrote: ↑Sat Dec 16, 2017 6:21 pm Obviously wine scales up as high as you want and probably faster than liquor, but the base for "not shit" or "what most people drink after getting out of college" is way cheaper for wine.
Yellowtail/Barefoot type stuff at <$10 vs Smirnoff/Crown/Jose/whatever at about double that... Not that anyone else on DFD would be caught dead drinking any of those things.
...and the cheapest wine is $2.xx, less than half the price of an "equivalent" liquor.[user not found] wrote: ↑Sat Dec 16, 2017 6:26 pmI'm only talking whiskey. papov(?) Was like $8 for a handle in college if I recall?troyguitar wrote:Obviously wine scales up as high as you want and probably faster than liquor, but the base for "not shit" or "what most people drink after getting out of college" is way cheaper for wine.
Yellowtail/Barefoot type stuff at <$10 vs Smirnoff/Crown/Jose/whatever at about double that... Not that anyone else on DFD would be caught dead drinking any of those things.
What calculation? I was reacting with a to the idea that a $40 bottle of wine is on the same level as $40 booze, the cheapest way to get is bottom shelf liquor in the biggest bottle you can buy - assuming you can keep it down long enough to getCorvetteWaxer wrote: ↑Sat Dec 16, 2017 6:28 pmWhy not.... ?troyguitar wrote: ↑Sat Dec 16, 2017 6:21 pm Obviously wine scales up as high as you want and probably faster than liquor, but the base for "not shit" or "what most people drink after getting out of college" is way cheaper for wine.
Yellowtail/Barefoot type stuff at <$10 vs Smirnoff/Crown/Jose/whatever at about double that... Not that anyone else on DFD would be caught dead drinking any of those things.
You should also consider the alcohol content into your calculations. Wine is usually 14-20% or 28 - 40 proof where most whiskey is 80 proof +. So, you need more wine to do the same job of blood alcohol level.
What does that have to do with anything?[user not found] wrote: ↑Sat Dec 16, 2017 6:31 pmBut that $8 handle of Popov can get 5 people HAMMERED? It would take 7 bottle of $2 wine to get there.troyguitar wrote:
...and the cheapest wine is $2.xx, less than half the price of an "equivalent" liquor.
How is $40 wine suddenly the same as $40 liquor when it starts out less than half the price? Do most people just drink WAY better liquor than they do wine?
Go somewhere with wine that isn't full of rich people, they'll have stuff that's <$10 a bottle. The booze will be $15-30 a bottle at the same kind of place.
Sounds like you're the one in the minority here with extremely high wine standards...[user not found] wrote: ↑Sat Dec 16, 2017 6:35 pmPersonal preference. Wine v whiskey, both are Ok around $20 except for outliers.troyguitar wrote:
What does that have to do with anything?
The point was that an average "OK" wine is $10 and booze is $20-30, so a $40 wine is going ALL OUT for an average person while $40 booze is just a little nicer than usual.
Some would say that you haven't broken them yet.
The cheapest stuff matches that range for booze around me. I have never seen a $3 bottle of wine in a PA or NJ liquor store that I can recall.troyguitar wrote:...and the cheapest wine is $2.xx, less than half the price of an "equivalent" liquor.[user not found] wrote: ↑Sat Dec 16, 2017 6:26 pm I'm only talking whiskey. papov(?) Was like $8 for a handle in college if I recall?
How is $40 wine suddenly the same as $40 liquor when it starts out less than half the price? Do most people just drink WAY better liquor than they do wine?
Go somewhere with wine that isn't full of rich people, they'll have stuff that's <$10 a bottle. The booze will be $15-30 a bottle at the same kind of place.
Calvinball wrote: ↑Sat Dec 16, 2017 6:43 pmThe cheapest stuff matches that range for booze around me. I have never seen a $3 bottle of wine in a PA or NJ liquor store that I can recall.troyguitar wrote:
...and the cheapest wine is $2.xx, less than half the price of an "equivalent" liquor.
How is $40 wine suddenly the same as $40 liquor when it starts out less than half the price? Do most people just drink WAY better liquor than they do wine?
Go somewhere with wine that isn't full of rich people, they'll have stuff that's <$10 a bottle. The booze will be $15-30 a bottle at the same kind of place.
Sent from the Beer Depository
I agree with this.troyguitar wrote:What does that have to do with anything?[user not found] wrote: ↑Sat Dec 16, 2017 6:31 pm But that $8 handle of Popov can get 5 people HAMMERED? It would take 7 bottle of $2 wine to get there.
The point was that an average "OK" wine is $10 and booze is $20-30, so a $40 wine is going ALL OUT for an average person while $40 booze is just a little nicer than usual.
I know it exists, just not near me.troyguitar wrote:Calvinball wrote: ↑Sat Dec 16, 2017 6:43 pm The cheapest stuff matches that range for booze around me. I have never seen a $3 bottle of wine in a PA or NJ liquor store that I can recall.
Sent from the Beer Depository
Sno can probably articulate it better, but at a high level, I’d call it false enthusiasm with a concern over transporting it home.
Ectoplasm.4zilch wrote:Also kids have slimed everything
Yeah wow. Not around here.[user not found] wrote: ↑Sat Dec 16, 2017 5:54 pmThere are 12 pours in a bottle of whiskey and 4 in a bottle of wine.troyguitar wrote:
You apparently drink a lot more wine at a time? I get 3-4 glasses from a bottle of wine and maybe 8-10 from the same size bottle of liquor.
$40 is way out of my league for either one - more like a $5 and $25. I can't even imagine buying wine that expensive.
(That's by 'serving size' and technically it's 12 and 3/4 in a bottle of whiskey)