max225 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 13, 2017 1:10 pm
D Griff wrote: ↑Wed Dec 13, 2017 12:39 pm
No, I'm being serious, I wanted my car to break to get the mod and now it seemingly isn't
Me/my family have owned several Hondas from this era and all were far less dependable vehicles than my C5, although build quality was certainly better.
To be fair your C5 doesn't have 200k miles.
My C5 was not overly reliable ... by 50k miles (from 20)
1. EBCM module
2. Cracked wheel
3. Leaky ass
4. Fucked up hatch paint (bubbles) car was garaged 24/7 by all owners.
Due to MODZ FOR THE TRACK BRO
1. Sway bar kept squeaking every 5k miles
2. Leafspring bolt popped off leaving me stranged, only time that happened since my 1993 Mazda 626
3. Varamam was built like shit and was leaking dirty air
Yeah, I put in the LMC5 but never had a problem. 3 may be applicable to me and 4 is. Really though, the hatch paint thing (at least on cars I've seen) is very minor, 9/10 people would never notice. I'd also lump that into the poor build quality, not really a reliability issue.
I'm at almost 3.5 years ownershit, the car is 15ish years old and almost `100k miles and the only things to break have been a headlight motor, wiring for a sensor causing a CEL (free fix with a soldering iron and heat shield), and the HVAC screen.
When my Civic was only 10 years old with 130k miles, I had more issues annually than I do total on this car. It has certainly been better cared for over its life though. Nothing is perfect, but the C5 is a reliable car IMO.